The wicked wicket issue
By Rajadhyax
Word from New Zealand is that they
tried to make hard, tricky wickets on which the famed Indian batting line-up
could struggle, but it did not click for the black caps. On a more accusing
note, the South Africans and the Englishmen cried foul about “under prepared
wickets” whenever Anil Kumble ripped through
their batting order while playing in
India. Indians often alleged that Pak local hero Imran
Khan would always be provided with a green top in
To a mind not formally trained in
cricket two questions may arise. Can one really control the character of a
wicket to such an extent? Who makes the final call in deciding the nature of
the track before crucial encounters? To answer the second question first, the
authorisation varies from country to country and even from venue to venue. The
local cricket body, the team management and the deceptively hapless looking groundsman are the three focal points of power.
In
So the power centres may be variable
between countries but there is no denying the fact that pitches are monitored
to suit the home side.
In reply to the first question the
answer is ‘yes’. Pitches can be produced – with a certain degree of confidence
– to favour certain cricketing skills. Using tightly binding soil, mowing the
grass dry, exposing a brown tinge and making frequent cycles of
watering-rolling will usually create a strip good for batting. A green grassy
wicket with lose soil beneath is a heaven for quick bowlers as the skiddy surface makes them go faster behind the bat. Keeping
the surface abrasive, using clay like soil or keeping the surface under
prepared (just skip the rolling a few days) will assist the spinners. Making a
bouncy track using hard soil (as they do down-under) can also help the pace
bowlers as they will make the batsmen play regularly at an uncomfortable height.
Our local groundsman
Kashinath tells me, “it’s not easy to prepare a
certain type of surface, but given the time, anything is possible.” And he
knows a few things since many Ranji and Test players
have played on pitches he prepared. “You need three things,” he adds. “A clear
instruction as to what you want the wicket to do; sufficient equipment and
manpower to do it and, of course, a lot of time to work on the pitch.” There
can be no guarantees in this field but one can get the desired results more often
than not.
That leads us to the eternal debate
on whether it’s right or wrong to make wickets favourable to the hosting side.
Patriotism makes people do many things. When you want your side to win at all
costs, cricketing matters take the back seat. Winning and losing becomes more
important. That is why it’s been done almost everywhere. According to the rule
book of cricket there is nothing wrong in it as long as the wicket is not
deemed dangerous by the on-field umpires. Whether it’s ethically sound or not
is difficult to decide as the jury is still out on the issue. You may favour
the motion if winning matters to you and you feel that everyone does the same.
You could oppose the motion if sporting wickets and close contests matter more
to you than winning and losing.
At the end of the day differing
wickets do add a great challenge for cricketers to excel in all sorts of
conditions. To spectators also it’s fascinating to see the Englishmen
conquering turning tracks in Lanka or Pakistanis scoring on scorching quick
wickets in