IPL: two
sides of this coin
By Rajadhyax
The DLF IPL has split the world of
cricket pundits right through the middle. The
lucrative and popular short-format tourney has attracted its own bunch of
vitriolic critics. So on one hand you have crazy fans and commentators grabbing
every bit and byte of IPL, while on the other hand you have men like
But first let’s look at the positive
impact of the DLF sponsored extravaganza. IPL creates a fresh and challenging
platform for new and old cricketers to display their talent; the new ones doing
so to merit a call for national duty and bigger assignments while the older
ones doing it for prestige and that one last hurrah before they sign off into
history. This helps a healthy exchange of ideas between the veterans and green
horns. For instance, what Parthiv Patel can pick up
from Matt Hayden or Abhishek Nair from Sachin Tendulkar is quite
immeasurable.
IPL also helps
cricketers, coaches, broadcasters, sponsors and commentators to make commercial
gains. Not all cricketers had previously enjoyed financial security, except
the regulars in their respective national teams. And it’s not just the ones
associated with the game who will be earning this time. Donations are being
made towards South African educational system as well.
Ultimately, the big advantage is
also going to cricket itself as a sport. Multitudes are getting glued to TV
sets and thousands are gathering at the grounds to enjoy uninhibited cricket at
its best where a Yusuf Pathan lifts a ball over
long-on for a 109 meters six or a previously unknown Jakati
casts a spell with vicious left-arm spin.
Then there are miscellaneous gains
as well. IPL has become a personified member of millions of families with games
being analysed over lunch and dinner tables. IPL is encouraging clones at a
state level. The first to jump on the band wagon is the state of Maharashtra
where their cricket-association has started the
But everything said and done, there
are IPL detractors as well. In a recent article penned by Neil Manthrop from
Others like Kaveree
Bamzai rue that television rating points of Season 1
were 7-8 while for Season 2 they are languishing at 4-5. Chesterfield,
meanwhile, wants us to believe that IPL is nothing more than a money making exercise and that it is bad advertisement for cricket. In
his book, Lalit Modi is a modern day Genghis Khan, a marauder dressed as an
administrator. From the scantily clad cheer-girls to Kochhar’s
lack lustre Extra Innings show and from lesser crowds to shortage of 200-plus
scores, everything of this season of IPL has been criticised.
On the flip side, it is worth
appreciating that after the myopic view of its critics, unfortunate timing of
India’s national elections and the logistical challenge of managing an event of
this scale, Modi and his men have successfully shifted base in a short duration
and put up a magnificent show. Cricketers, cricket writers (like yours truly),
fans and every single person associated with IPL management is going around
with a big, satiated grin. Don’t bite your lips at that, guys, doff your hats!
To put IPL in a cliché then, you
like it or hate it, you cannot afford to ignore it.